Frequently Asked Questions

This is only true if the race is very close.   Like really close.   So close that a handful of write-in votes could turn the tide one way or the other.   And if the race is that close, I would argue that no candidate has a clear mandate and so they probably are all bad choices.

I don't want to be president.   I wouldn't be running if I believed there was the slightest chance I'd actually be elected.

Quite the opposite!   The election process is all about you telling the world what you want.   If you feel you have to "hold your nose and vote" for a candidate based primarily on their qualification of not being the other candidate, you're not really being given a free voice in the election.   My campaign is all about encouraging people to vote for who they really want, rather than forcing them to choose between the "lesser of two evils".

Well, that's not really a question but I'll address it anyway.   If you check Whois and the Wayback Machine, you'll see that I started this campaign in May, long before there was any significant discussion of a major party nominating a woman.

My original slogan was "If you don't want to vote for a rich old pervert, vote for me -- I'm not rich!".   Unfortunately one of the rich old perverts dropped out.   Their replacement, although not young, is somewhat less old, and I've not yet seen any evidence that they're a pervert.   I much prefer the old slogan; it had better "punch".  

It's really easy: Vote for me!   And encourage your friends, neighbors, and random strangers you meet at the gym to also vote for me.

Oh.   That's easy too: You can't.   I am not accepting financial support of any kind.  

If you feel the need to throw money at me, make a donation to your local food pantry.  In your own name.  (But think of me while you do it.)